Tuple Format?
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Sun Sep 3 03:04:34 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Sep 3 03:04:34 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Newbie Question - String Input
- Next message (by thread): Tuple Format?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Jürgen A. Erhard" <juergen.erhard at gmx.net> wrote in message news:03092000.2 at sanctum.local.jae.ddns.org... [snip] > People don't have a problem because they don't use it... at least *I* > don't. I didn't even know it's there... > > Or I don't have to (what use is an empty tuple?) > > A one-element tuple is something you *have* to deal with (at least for > the apply(...) case, I think). apply is a typical case that comes to mind for the empty tuple as well. Still, there are easy syntactic alternatives: def tup(*stuff): return stuff tup() will now return (), tup("goo") will return ("goo",), and for any number N>1 of arguments, it will be just as if the 'tup' word was not there. [I'd rather say 'tuple', but it's better not to pre-empt the existing built-in function that tupleizes sequences]. Alex
- Previous message (by thread): Newbie Question - String Input
- Next message (by thread): Tuple Format?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list