Aahz Maruch aahz at panix.com
Mon Sep 18 22:16:26 EDT 2000

• Previous message (by thread): Of what use is 'lambda'???
• Next message (by thread): Of what use is 'lambda'???
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

In article <39C6C4BF.430048FE at yahoo.com>, tye4  <tye4 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>The lambda definition is limited to only one expression, and everything
>you do with lambda, can also be done with plain functions.

Yup.  Lambda is worthless.  Don't use it.

(I'm half-joking, but only half-joking.  Try learning Lisp or Haskell,
and then lambdas will probably make more sense.)
-- 
                      --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at pobox.com)

Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het    <*>     http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a question, but 
to post the wrong information.  --Aahz

---

• Previous message (by thread): Of what use is 'lambda'???
• Next message (by thread): Of what use is 'lambda'???
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list