Is this true regarding Python's limitation?
Cary O'Brien
cobrien at Radix.Net
Sat Sep 23 07:28:07 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Sep 23 07:28:07 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Is this true regarding Python's limitation?
- Next message (by thread): Is this true regarding Python's limitation?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <8qdjhu$jhm$1 at newshost.accu.uu.nl>, Martijn Faassen <m.faassen at vet.uu.nl> wrote: >Cameron Laird <claird at starbase.neosoft.com> wrote: >> In article <8qdfcn$71b$1 at nnrp1.deja.com>, vbMark <vbmark at my-deja.com> wrote: >>>Someone told me that the reason Java is better than Python for server- >>>side CGI is because where Java uses one process and creates threads for >>>each user's access, Python creates sperate processes for each user's >>>CGI access. So using Python would greatly limit and perhaps crash a >>>server. >>> >>>Is this true? >> . >> Urban legend. There are a few isolated words in your description >> that correspond in a barely recognizable way to truth. Do NOT >> shun Python for CGI because it "would ... perhaps crash a server" >> (and certainly not in comparison with Java). > >In particular, Zope (built with Python) does do exactly what Python isn't >supposed to do according to this person; create separate threads for each >user's request. > Hmm... Doesn't it really keep a pool of threads around? (I wish ps and strace understood threads better!). -- cary >http://www.zope.org > >Regards, > >Martijn >-- >History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3? >No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?
- Previous message (by thread): Is this true regarding Python's limitation?
- Next message (by thread): Is this true regarding Python's limitation?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list