Python Strings
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 6 17:18:58 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Sep 6 17:18:58 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Python Strings
- Next message (by thread): Python Strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Erik Max Francis" <max at alcyone.com> wrote in message news:39B68D9D.147A5023 at alcyone.com... [snip] > I think it would be a mistake to consider these pairs of words synonyms; > strongly typed vs. weakly typed and statically typed vs. dynamically > typed are two different (orthogonal) measures. Python is strongly It's unfortunate terminology, but it's definitely very widespread, and it has been for a LONG time. See, for example, the "Revised(5) Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme", e.g. at http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~jaffer/r5rs_3.html#SEC5 """ Scheme has latent as opposed to manifest types. Types are associated with values (also called objects) rather than with variables. (Some authors refer to languages with latent types as weakly typed or dynamically typed languages.) """ Although I agree with you that "_dynamically_ typed" is more descriptive, maybe we should start talking about "latent" types instead -- although it has good precedent, it's still unusual enough an idiom, in everyday programming usage, not to have inappropriate and misleading connotations:-). Alex
- Previous message (by thread): Python Strings
- Next message (by thread): Python Strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list