Python 1.6 The balanced language
lobozc at my-deja.com
lobozc at my-deja.com
Fri Sep 1 19:36:26 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Sep 1 19:36:26 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Python 1.6 The balanced language
- Next message (by thread): Python 1.6 The balanced language
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <8olv8a$tvj$1 at slb0.atl.mindspring.net>, aahz at netcom.com (Aahz Maruch) wrote: > Generators are pretty likely to make it into Python through the > Stackless implementation. In addition, they're reasonably likely to > make it in even without Stackless, assuming someone comes up with a good > implementation -- they'd be incredly useful for generic lazy "for" > loops. I suspected as much but I'm very happy to hear you confirming that. I hope that the Stackless will make it one day (soon...) Now, what about goal directed evaluation :-) ? Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
- Previous message (by thread): Python 1.6 The balanced language
- Next message (by thread): Python 1.6 The balanced language
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list