No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
Aahz Maruch
aahz at panix.com
Sat Sep 9 12:13:02 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Sep 9 12:13:02 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
- Next message (by thread): No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <wkem2uixcq.fsf at turangalila.harmonixmusic.com>, Dan Schmidt <dfan at harmonixmusic.com> wrote: > >Or in Python 2.0, > > S = [[] for x in range(5)] I'm calling once again for everyone to please refrain from giving Python 2.0 answers to questions unless the questioner specifically mentions Python 2.0. IMO, it unnecessarily complicates things, because most people asking questions need to use a shipping version of Python. -- --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at pobox.com) Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/ Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 Usenet is not a democracy. It is a weird cross between an anarchy and a dictatorship. --Aahz
- Previous message (by thread): No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
- Next message (by thread): No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list