Python Strings
Jonadab the Unsightly One
jonadab at bright.net
Wed Sep 6 05:51:05 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Sep 6 05:51:05 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Python Strings
- Next message (by thread): Python Strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Alex Martelli" <aleaxit at yahoo.com> wrote: > > So, anyway, how flexible is Python's typeing? > > It's pretty strict, but entirely carried by *objects*, never > by *names*. All a 'name' does is act as a label, or, maybe > better, a 'post-it', since it can most easily be "peeled off" > any object and (just-as-temporarily) bound to any other. The > "items" in a list or dictionary work just the same way as > 'names' (as they should, since names are pretty transparently > just keys to items in some dictionary:-), as do the arguments > to functions and the values they return. Sounds good. IIUC. > Most everything you'll care about is an object (and thus > can be named, appended to a list, placed in a dictionary, > passed as an argument, returned as a function's result): > numbers, strings, functions, classes, modules, methods > (either unbound or bound), instances, lists, dictionaries, > and quite a few other things. Sounds very good. > although of course the "return something()" can fail at > runtime if 'something', while bound to something callable > (a function, method, class, or instance having a __call__ > method, for example), is not callable *without arguments*. Ah, a gotcha. (In some languages, all functions can be called with no arguments. Of course, they are not guaranteed to always do something useful, but that's the programmer's lookout.) > But, if need be, you can do more 'introspection' (aka > 'reflection'), and find out more about the object than > just whether it's callable or not. Python excels at this > (it's so inebriating and liberating that it's easy to go > overboard and forget one doesn't normally HAVE to do any > such analysis -- it's there for the time in a hundred it > may really be useful...!-). Stop it. You're making a believer out of me. It's too soon for that. I don't even *know* this language yet. - jonadab
- Previous message (by thread): Python Strings
- Next message (by thread): Python Strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list