1.6 or 2.0b1?
Peter Hansen
peter at engcorp.com
Sun Sep 24 00:24:28 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Sep 24 00:24:28 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): 1.6 or 2.0b1?
- Next message (by thread): How to terminate after traceback?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aahz Maruch wrote: > > In article <39CD2674.66158180 at nycap.rr.com>, > Grant Austin <archer at nycap.rr.com> wrote: > > > >I'm new to programming in all respects, and am wondering if I should > >start with python 1.6 or 2.0b1? > > I'd start with 1.5.2 now and switch to 2.0final later. You (Grant) probably have not experienced spending a lot of time learning some new language or technology, only to find out that it changes underneath your feet even as you are learning it. In this particular case, there are a few changes coming up in 2.0 which might cause you some confusion if you hear about them in this newsgroup or try to run programs that you've downloaded and which take advantage of them. (For example, strings will support a more object-oriented style of manipulation, but only in 2.0.) If you need to start right away, download 1.5.2 and use it for now (it's quite easy to install and experiment with) but keep in mind that many people in this forum will be (and already are!) discussing 2.0 features. In other words, don't get too attached to 1.5.2. -- Peter Hansen
- Previous message (by thread): 1.6 or 2.0b1?
- Next message (by thread): How to terminate after traceback?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list