No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
Aahz Maruch
aahz at panix.com
Sun Sep 10 10:49:43 EDT 2000
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Sep 10 10:49:43 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
- Next message (by thread): No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <128mrssnahq8h3ks57jtjtb7qm3tnkegu1 at 4ax.com>, Kirby Urner <urner at alumni.princeton.edu> wrote: >aahz at panix.com (Aahz Maruch) wrote: >> >>I think at the very least anyone proferring a 2.0 solution should >>clearly mention that 2.0 is not shipping yet. I think it's cruel to >>hold out a carrot in front of someone and then snatch it away. > >I don't understand this point. 2.0b is available for anyone to >install. 2.0b1, yes, but not 2.0. >Is the objection that it's beta? 1.6 has been alpha/beta for a long >time too. It's not realistic to always refrain from talking about >something until it's out of beta. I'm not suggesting that people *always* refrain from talking about 2.0; I'm suggesting that people refrain from mentioning 2.0 features in response to questions about, "How do I do <X> in Python?" -- --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at pobox.com) Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/ Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 Usenet is not a democracy. It is a weird cross between an anarchy and a dictatorship. --Aahz
- Previous message (by thread): No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
- Next message (by thread): No Python 2.0 (was Re: idiom for initial list of lists)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list