Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
Courageous
jkraska at san.rr.com
Thu Dec 27 13:51:19 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Dec 27 13:51:19 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
- Next message (by thread): REPOST: Re: Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>I don't want programming to be forcibly OO. In Ruby, can you write >a procedure which isn't part of a class? (Like you can in Python, but >can't in Java). If not, then Ruby is forcing you to hammer square pegs >into round holes. I agree with you in spirit, however I should like to point out that Python's module system puts your functions into a module object, indeed making these functions completely object oriented, except without the added syntactic weight. You have all of the benefits with syntactic brevity at the same time, which would seem to satisfy the Occam's Razor of programming, or at least to me. C//
- Previous message (by thread): Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
- Next message (by thread): REPOST: Re: Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list