Distutils bdist_rpm missing licence option?
Tom Bryan
tbryan at python.net
Mon Dec 3 22:29:56 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Dec 3 22:29:56 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Handling division by zero
- Next message (by thread): Distutils bdist_rpm missing licence option?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Hudson wrote: > Tom Bryan <tbryan at python.net> writes: > >> I'm using Distutils-1.0.2 with Python-1.5.2. I'm trying to build an RPM >> for PyUnit. Here's my .cfg file > A wild guess, but could you put the licence option somewhere global to > distutils rather than specific to bdist_rpm? Thanks. That put me onto the right track. It looks like the setup.cfg file can only override options specific to the individual setup targets, such as bdist_rpm. Some options can only be specified during the call to the setup function itself. I think that the Distutils docs might state this fact, but it is a subtle point that seems easy to miss. This design decision seems wise since the author probably doesn't want packagers to override options like "licence". I finally noticed that the chart that lists the "licence" option states "Distutils setup script option" while the options on the following page of my hardcopy are in a separate chart that staties "bdist_rpm option". The fact that the charts printed out on separate pages probably didn't help. Next time, I'll stick to the online docs. :-) here-we-go-a-packaging-ly y'rs, ---Tom
- Previous message (by thread): Handling division by zero
- Next message (by thread): Distutils bdist_rpm missing licence option?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list