Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
Dudley Carr
dcarr1 at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 27 07:21:57 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Dec 27 07:21:57 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
- Next message (by thread): Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
First and foremost, the rate at which a language is growing, especially in terms of industry acceptance, is always difficult to tell since rarely is a survey done to find out how many people are using a particular language across all industries. Personally, I use the following metric to see how a language is progressing: 1. Look at the number of Oreilly books (possibly books by other publishers) that have been or are going to be released in relation to the language. 2. Number of articles on programming websites using / explaining the language. 2. Look the support for new technologies in the language and its libraries. 3. Activity in the newsgroup is also very indicative esp. with the number of newbie questions flowing-in (mention in an earlier post). With that said, super-spectacular growth is not always the greatest thing. If we learned anything from the dot-com bust is that growing too fast has its consequences. Python, I believe, prides itself on its evolutionary rather than revolutionary approach to getting things done; and that's exactly how it ought to be (my Darwinian opinion of course). Another issue to address is this business of corporations adopting Python and/or producing Python products. Aside from ActiveState's Visual Python, Zope, Blender, and a handful of other products, people generally have a tough time regurgitating the list of Python products. This is probably due to the fact that Python manages to do so much out of the box, and if it doesn't its not that difficult to get Python to do what you want it to do. Regardless of all of this, it actually doesn't matter that a new Python product isn't introduced on a daily basis. Take C-shell or the Bash shell for example, how many companies are producing products with those languages featuring on the front of the box? Does that mean that C-shell and Bash are not widely used? So where does Python stand in relation to Perl, PHP, Ruby or Javascript in terms of popularity? Who cares?! Python, although not the fastest beast on the block, scratches the itch that none of the other scripting languages seem to be able to do. Oh yeah, and Python is also fun.
- Previous message (by thread): Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
- Next message (by thread): Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list