"in" operator for strings
Henning VON ROSEN
hvrosen at world-online.no
Thu Feb 1 04:50:17 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 1 04:50:17 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): "in" operator for strings
- Next message (by thread): "in" operator for strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Pete Shinners" <shredwheat at mediaone.net> skrev i melding news:hK8e6.141262$y9.26215366 at typhoon.we.rr.com... > with the back and forth going on about the "in" operator and > dictionaries, i was thinking it would be nice for the "in" > operator to also check for the presence of substrings in a > string. for example... > > > >>> "Waldo" in "Ralph Emerson" > 0 > >>> "Waldo" in "Ralph Waldo Emerson" > 1 try this: >>> "Waldo" in "Ralph Waldo Emerson".split() 1 as long as you are looking for a "word" amike via Henning > i find this much more intuitive and graceful than the current > syntax i am repeatedly using... > > >>> "Ralph Emerson".find("Waldo") != -1 > 0 > > > anyways, it may not stand a snowball's chance. but i'd hope > the 'powers that be' could at least take a second to think > about it and explain a yea or nea. > > it's just an idea that came to me. i know i would like it, but > there is likely something i'm overlooking. i would think it > could have a serious chance of being accepted? > > >
- Previous message (by thread): "in" operator for strings
- Next message (by thread): "in" operator for strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list