PEP status and python-dev summaries
Paul Moore
paul.moore at uk.origin-it.com
Mon Feb 12 11:59:54 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Feb 12 11:59:54 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): PEP status and python-dev summaries
- Next message (by thread): PEP status and python-dev summaries
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:25:23 +0100 , Andrew Cooke <andrew at intertrader.com> wrote: >All IMHO - I'm not involved in Python, just curious about how this >problem is going to be handled. How is it handled in Perl? Is there a >Python equivalent of the porters, for example? The perl5 porters list is the equivalent of python-dev. The difference is that P5P is basically an open list. This has some significant downsides (P5P has had a history of degenerating into flamefests and noise), but that is more likely a consequence of certain personality issues and a lack of any sort of moderation on P5P than an essential aspect of the process... P5P is a good counterexample to the argument that python-dev should be completely open, but IMHO there should be a middle ground somewhere. Paul Moore.
- Previous message (by thread): PEP status and python-dev summaries
- Next message (by thread): PEP status and python-dev summaries
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list