why the string function / module change
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
qrczak at knm.org.pl
Thu Feb 22 11:02:16 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 22 11:02:16 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): why the string function / module change
- Next message (by thread): a few linux/unix related questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
21 Feb 2001 22:32:46 GMT, Remco Gerlich <scarblac at pino.selwerd.nl> pisze: > > If you are appending to a list object you use <listobj>.append(), and > > not listmodule.append(<listobj>). Similarly with dictionaries, and so on... > > But lists and dictionaries are mutable, and files are as well, in a way. > Strings are not. Why should it matter? > Nor are tuples and integers, and those don't have methods either. I see no fundamental reason why they should not, except that Python already expressed them as builtin syntax or builtin functions which recognize builtin types (+, ==, len). -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk * qrczak at knm.org.pl http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/ \__/ ^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA QRCZAK
- Previous message (by thread): why the string function / module change
- Next message (by thread): a few linux/unix related questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list