Collection interfaces
Brian Gridley
Brian.Gridley at LibertyMutual.com
Wed Feb 28 13:21:40 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Feb 28 13:21:40 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Collection interfaces
- Next message (by thread): Collection interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I can imagine some limited places where this would be so, or some constraints that would make this so, but it is hard to imagine on a project with any depth. I did procedural and 4GL for 15 years, and Smalltalk for 5. I helped write a major system in Smalltalk at the same time our competitor wrote something from nearly identical specs. Ours cost 1/3 of theirs, supplied more features, and is far more flexible. Perhaps you can provide specifics to enlighten us as to what you have found procedural to do better. "Topmind" <topmind at technologist.com> wrote in message news:MPG.1506d244a87ac34b9896c3 at news.earthlink.net... > > > Using procedural and table techniques, I have matched > > > Smalltalk "can-you-do-this" challenges in the past, > > > and usually with more K.I.S.S. > > ...> OO is far more Guru-oriented than anything before it. It is > generating tons of lore, scriptures, and meditation materials > without any objective proof or metrics that it is better...
- Previous message (by thread): Collection interfaces
- Next message (by thread): Collection interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list