Speed of Python vs. Perl
Mike Coffin
mhc at Eng.Sun.COM
Sat Jan 13 23:38:24 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Jan 13 23:38:24 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Speed of Python vs. Perl
- Next message (by thread): Speed of Python vs. Perl
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
pj at sgi.com (Paul Jackson) writes: > Tim wrote > |> Talk someone into writing a patch; I've got no bandwidth to spare. > > See another branch of this news thread for a patch (both 1.5.2 > and 2.0 variants). > > Me thinks this (getting startup time competitive with Perl) is > a hard problem, and that the two tweaks in my patch help, but > not greatly. > > The combination of the dynamic nature of Python, with having > much of its run time library support loaded from Python code, > not compiled in, would seem to force Python to do upwards of > 10 million instructions on startup. > > I don't see anyway around this. One way is to provide some sort of "dump" facility that allows the program to initialize, dump the state, and then make an executable from the dumped state. Emacs does (or at least, did) this to reduce startup time. -mike
- Previous message (by thread): Speed of Python vs. Perl
- Next message (by thread): Speed of Python vs. Perl
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list