python compiled to native in less than a year?
scotth
slhath at flash.net
Mon Jan 15 11:18:12 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jan 15 11:18:12 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): python compiled to native in less than a year?
- Next message (by thread): python compiled to native in less than a year?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Since Python will be one of the .NET languages, it will get compiled like all the other .NET languages. Whatever the problems, ActiveState/MS have/are going to over come it if my info is correct. Scott "Roy Katz" <katz at Glue.umd.edu> wrote in message news:Pine.GSO.4.21.0101151106200.7702-100000 at z.glue.umd.edu... > Scott, > > the problem with Python compilation is optimization; you can "freeze" a > python program into an executable even now. I heard it somewhere that > compiled Python would consist of nothing more than calls to Python's C > API. Granted, that shaves off the interpreter layer, but you're still > going through the P-API. I suspect it is the same way in JPython > (given that JPython implements the Python API in Java, am I right? (?)).. > > > > /R > > > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, scotth wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Since the new .NET platform from MS will take all the compatible .NET > > languages and transform them to an IL (intermediate language ???), then take > > the IL to native compiled code, this means that python will be compiled, but > > only for the Windows platform. > > > > Is what I have said correct, or have I missed something? This would give > > python a huge boost! > > > > Scott > > > > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): python compiled to native in less than a year?
- Next message (by thread): python compiled to native in less than a year?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list