[Python-iterators] While we're at it...
Thomas Wouters
thomas at xs4all.net
Mon Jul 2 03:22:39 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jul 2 03:22:39 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-iterators] While we're at it...
- Next message (by thread): Why Not Translate Perl to C
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:03:18AM +1000, Delaney, Timothy wrote: > > >Of course, an iterator map would be useful: > > > > > >def iter_map(f, seq): > > > for o in seq: > > > yield f(o) > > > > This is a generator, not just an iterator. > def iter_map (f, seq): > > def iter_map_generator (f=f, seq=seq): > for o in seq: > yield f(o) > return iter_map_generator() While this makes a technical difference, the result is exactly the same. It's just slower :-) The first example (iter_map, the generator) shows exactly why 'yield' isn't magic and a generator should be defined using 'def': all you need is 'yield' instead of 'result.append()' and you magically do the right thing :-) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-iterators] While we're at it...
- Next message (by thread): Why Not Translate Perl to C
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list