Toppling the numeric tower
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Thu Jul 26 17:21:55 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jul 26 17:21:55 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Toppling the numeric tower
- Next message (by thread): Toppling the numeric tower
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Tim Hochberg" <tim.hochberg at ieee.org> writes: > For discussion purposes, I'm going to assume that some forms of PEP 237, 238 > and 239 are eventually adopted. In that case, integers and longs will be > unified. The integers can then be completely emebedded into rationals. This > leaves us with just one level of precision/range for exact numbers (infinite > more or less) and one level of precision/range for inexact numbers (C > double). This allows the numeric tower to be knocked down and stirred around > to form a box: > > Real Complex > | | > rRational cRational -- Rational (Exact) > rFloat cFloat -- Float (Inexact) I just don't see much use for complex rational... So then we're back to my original tower (with rational). --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message (by thread): Toppling the numeric tower
- Next message (by thread): Toppling the numeric tower
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list