Why isn't Python king of the hill?
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 2 03:42:34 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Jun 2 03:42:34 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Why isn't Python king of the hill?
- Next message (by thread): Why isn't Python king of the hill?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Grant Edwards" <grante at visi.com> wrote in message news:slrn9hgpmo.jl.grante at tuxtop.visi.com... ... > _never_ expect an exact result and not to use binary floating > point if you require an exact result. > > You may thing that 1.0 + 2.0 == 3.0 ought to be true, but you And it is (on any FP system respecting IEEE 754 -- and any other FP system I've ever heard about). > should always treat floating point operations as if there are > small random numbers being thrown in at every step. So you I think this is exactly what Kahan describes as one of the widespread (and false) myths about floating point. Alex
- Previous message (by thread): Why isn't Python king of the hill?
- Next message (by thread): Why isn't Python king of the hill?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list