Meta: PEP discussion (was Re: PEP 255: Simple Generators)
James_Althoff at i2.com
James_Althoff at i2.com
Tue Jun 26 13:19:48 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jun 26 13:19:48 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Meta: PEP discussion (was Re: PEP 255: Simple Generators)
- Next message (by thread): Meta: PEP discussion (was Re: PEP 255: Simple Generators)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Peters wrote: <snip> >Some implementations of Icon work that way, but they've used several >approaches over the years. In no case did they expose any of the internals, >though. We didn't *have* to expose Python's generator-iterator object >either, but doing so adds (IMO) significant power over Icon's generators -- >and it's more Pythonic to do so anyway. I agree. Thanks for an excellent decision! :-) Jim
- Previous message (by thread): Meta: PEP discussion (was Re: PEP 255: Simple Generators)
- Next message (by thread): Meta: PEP discussion (was Re: PEP 255: Simple Generators)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list