Another Wart! string.find() [ was: namespace issue? ]
Michael Powe
michael+gnus at trollope.org
Fri Jun 22 10:18:19 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jun 22 10:18:19 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Another Wart! string.find() [ was: namespace issue? ]
- Next message (by thread): Another Wart! string.find() [ was: namespace issue? ]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Dalke <dalke at acm.org> writes: Andrew> Steven D. Majewski wrote: >> It probably *ought* to return None for not found: >> "string"[None] yields an exception: "TypeError: sequence index >> must be integer" while "string"[-1] returns "g" so a coding >> error is likely to slip thru without an exception. >> I'ld love to see it fixed, however, I suspect that in this >> case, many lines of installed code trumps Computer Programming >> for Everybody! >>>> print string.find.__doc__ Andrew> find(s, sub [,start [,end]]) -> in Andrew> Return the lowest index in s where substring sub is found, Andrew> such that sub is contained within s[start,end]. Optional Andrew> arguments start and end are interpreted as in slice Andrew> notation. Andrew> Return -1 on failure. >>>> print string.index.__doc__ Andrew> index(s, sub [,start [,end]]) -> int Andrew> Return the lowest index in s where substring sub is Andrew> found, such that sub is contained within s[start,end]. Andrew> Optional arguments start and end are interpreted as in Andrew> slice notation. Andrew> Raise ValueError if not found. Pardon the dumb question, but can you test this in a conditional, as in if not string.index(s,sub) : /* and so forth and so on */ mp
- Previous message (by thread): Another Wart! string.find() [ was: namespace issue? ]
- Next message (by thread): Another Wart! string.find() [ was: namespace issue? ]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list