Is this a true statement? (fwd)
David C. Ullrich
ullrich at math.okstate.edu
Mon Jun 25 10:32:29 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jun 25 10:32:29 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Is this a true statement? (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): Win32GUI Question...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:48:34 -0400, Peter Hansen <peter at engcorp.com> wrote: >"David C. Ullrich" wrote: >> >> On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:14:31 -0400 (EDT), "Steven D. Majewski" >> <sdm7g at Virginia.EDU> wrote: >> >> >I concede, David! >> >Your logic is unassailable >> >and your point is significant. >> >> The "point" about device drivers is certainly not >> "significant" in any way I can imagine. This _did_ >> start with honest _questions_, which actually >> nobody's answered. For all I know "write a >> device driver" _could_ mean something other >> than "write a certain sequence of bytes to >> a file". > >"Write a device driver [in language X]" means to use >language X as the *source language*, and with existing >(i.e. not theoretical) tools, turn that source into >an output file (usually "machine code") capable of >performing the functions typically defined as requiring >"device drivers". For more of us it does, anyway. > >It does not mean "using a program written in language X, >generate a file containing an identical sequence of bytes >to that which would have been generated using the above >method with some other language". > >Or something like that. Something like that indeed. > Really, it isn't that hard. > >(If it will help, since your words above suggest the >possibility you actually might be missing something here, >look at the distinction between "write a device driver >in Python" and "write a device driver file using >Python". The word "in" in the former suggests using >Python as the direct source language of the driver, >not as a utility or compiler to be used in the process.) If someone had said this yesterday would have saved a lot of space. (Not a complaint, there's no way anyone could realize that this actually is what I was missing about the terminology.) >Something tells me this won't be an epiphany for you... :) And exactly what tells you that? Up to this line my reaction was "thank you very much". My reply to this bit would be a little different... >possibility you don't understand I asked _repeatedly_ whether "write a device driver" means something other than "write a certain sequence of bytes to a file". Nobody answers the question. I point out it hasn't been answered and ask again. Nobody answers the question. Yes, I did have a hard time understanding answers that did not exist. "Really, it isn't that hard" is really not condescending, I guess. If you think it's possible to deduce what people mean by a phrase when they're not telling you you're wrong. David C. Ullrich ********************* "Sometimes you can have access violations all the time and the program still works." (Michael Caracena, comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc 5/1/01)
- Previous message (by thread): Is this a true statement? (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): Win32GUI Question...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list