Not enough Python library development [was PEP scepticism]
Andrew Kuchling
akuchlin at mems-exchange.org
Fri Jun 29 18:41:25 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jun 29 18:41:25 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Not enough Python library development [was PEP scepticism]
- Next message (by thread): PEP scepticism
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roman Suzi <rnd at onego.ru> writes: > CPyAN is much more complex task, because there are: > > - security considerations > - integration with distutils > - probably, one day python will allow the "import" shown above > (I even think it is already possible) > - dependency resolution framework... Not necessarily. An annoying habit of the Python community is to write an initial requirement list that's so forbiddingly long that everyone is frightened away and nothing is ever implemented. But you don't have to implement everything to have something useful. Case in point: Parnassus, which does exactly 0 of the above 4 items, yet it's definitely not useless. --amk
- Previous message (by thread): Not enough Python library development [was PEP scepticism]
- Next message (by thread): PEP scepticism
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list