Wrong reasons to enhancing the language
Courageous
jkraska1 at san.rr.com
Sun Mar 18 23:34:23 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Mar 18 23:34:23 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Wrong reasons to enhancing the language
- Next message (by thread): Wrong reasons to enhancing the language
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>In my opinion, none of the above reasons is good enough to justify alone >changes to the language. There are other criteria that need to be met. Are >the extensions useful to many people? Are they generic and extensible? Do >they cause any compatibility issue? Do they adhere to the principles which make Python uniquely Python? Sometimes I feel it's as if the implementors or the users just need to add features in order to have stuff to do and things to learn. I, however, prefer to not do any learning with my computer programming language. I want to use my language to CREATE THINGS; the language is an incidental tool on the path to achieving some other objective. That's one of the reasons I like Python so much. It's a demure language, always soft-spoken and not under foot. C//
- Previous message (by thread): Wrong reasons to enhancing the language
- Next message (by thread): Wrong reasons to enhancing the language
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list