GNU/Linux vs. Windows as Python platform
Martijn Faassen
m.faassen at vet.uu.nl
Fri May 18 11:47:24 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri May 18 11:47:24 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): GNU/Linux vs. Windows as Python platform
- Next message (by thread): GNU/Linux vs. Windows as Python platform
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy <reedy37 at home.com> wrote: [snip] > By binaries, I was thinking of extension modules like PIL, wxPython, etc > for which the developers have often made Windows binaries but not > everything else. Note that many distributions do package these up. I don't know about wxPython, but Debian for instance does package up PIL and quite a host of other extensions. Debian has a very nice dependency management system, so in some cases installing stuff is actually easier and safer than it is on Windows. That said, in other cases it's likely easier to go the Windows route (PyGame for instance is a hassle to install due to the many dependencies). Regards, Martijn -- History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3? No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?
- Previous message (by thread): GNU/Linux vs. Windows as Python platform
- Next message (by thread): GNU/Linux vs. Windows as Python platform
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list