Against PEP 240
Robin Becker
robin at jessikat.fsnet.co.uk
Tue May 29 19:35:52 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue May 29 19:35:52 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Against PEP 240
- Next message (by thread): Against PEP 240
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <9f178j08af at enews2.newsguy.com>, Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> writes >"Cameron Laird" <claird at starbase.neosoft.com> wrote in message >news:0E0E06297253FE1B.D13D6C3BAEE41AD8.4A273FCB042833CB at lp.airnews.net... > ... >> Let's be precise: extensions that pass float- >> ing point data will all be broken. I don't > >...how? > >> regard broken extensions lightly; I know what >> a cost it can be to reassemble all the parts >> just to recreate what one had before. Do you >> agree there'd be value in adding a coda to the >> PEP about how to rewrite extensions? Shall > >What about just reminding extension writers to >use PyFloat_AsDouble and emphatically _NOT_ the >PyFloat_AS_DOUBLE macro? What am I missing? > speed; some matrix algorithms are say order n if I have an extra layer of order n caused by additional input checks some will get demented and cry out particularly if as in some rather strange economic models the algorithm is the inner loop with 5 or 6 loops around it. -- Robin Becker
- Previous message (by thread): Against PEP 240
- Next message (by thread): Against PEP 240
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list