Benefits of moving from Python to Common Lisp?
Michael Hudson
mwh at python.net
Tue Nov 13 05:14:32 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Nov 13 05:14:32 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Benefits of moving from Python to Common Lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Benefits of moving from Python to Common Lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Andrew Dalke" <dalke at dalkescientific.com> writes: > Tim Bradshaw: > > Languages such as Perl and (I think) Python are *single instance* > > classes - there is only one implementation, and the language > > is defined implicitly by that implementation. > > As a minor clarification, there are several distinct implementations > of Python (or a Python-like language). The ones I know of are: [snip] But they very much take their lead from CPython, so Tim's points all remain valid. Well, except for vyper, but that doesn't have enough influence to count (perhaps unfortunately). Cheers, M. -- That one is easily explained away as massively intricate conspiracy, though. -- Chris Klein, alt.sysadmin.recovery
- Previous message (by thread): Benefits of moving from Python to Common Lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Benefits of moving from Python to Common Lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list