IsPython really O-O?
Daniel Klein
danielk at aracnet.com
Wed Nov 14 15:28:11 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Nov 14 15:28:11 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): IsPython really O-O?
- Next message (by thread): IsPython really O-O?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:59:00 -0700, "Andrew Dalke" <dalke at dalkescientific.com> wrote: [snip] >When I first started Python, I wrote a class like: > >class Spam: > def __init__(self, x): > self.x = x > def show(self): > print self.x > >After I figured out it worked, I wanted to add a new method, so >I did > >class Spam: > def double(self): > self.x = self.x * 2 > >then was annoyed that it didn't work the way I expected. So I >don't think you are alone in this view. I bring it up here because >I suspect for many people this is forgotten amoung all the other >confusions in the early stages of learning Python. Just curious to know how it is that you expected this to work and why you were 'annoyed'? I can't see what the problem is with the double() method. >>> class Spam: def __init__(self,x): self.x = x def show(self): print self.x def double(self): self.x = self.x * 2 >>> s = Spam(1) >>> t = Spam('foo') >>> s.double() >>> t.double() >>> s.x 2 >>> t.x 'foofoo' >>> s.show() 2 >>> t.show() foofoo Daniel Klein
- Previous message (by thread): IsPython really O-O?
- Next message (by thread): IsPython really O-O?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list