Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Fri Nov 30 05:38:48 EST 2001

• Previous message (by thread): A modest indentation proposal
• Next message (by thread): A modest indentation proposal
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Steve Lamb <grey at despair.dmiyu.org> writes:

> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:09:28 -0800, Erann Gat <gat at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> > It also IMO makes the language unsuitable for mission-critical applications.
> > It's just too easy to screw up indentation (particularly when cutting and
> > pasting large blocks of code) without realizing it.
> 
>     Hogwash, plain and simple.  Either you know it because it is visually
> different or you know it when you test the application and it fails
> spectacularly.  You /do/ test your mission-critical applications, don't you?

Erann works at NASA, so I'd hope so...

Cheers,
M.

-- 
  I never realized it before, but having looked that over I'm certain
  I'd rather have my eyes burned out by zombies with flaming dung
  sticks than work on a conscientious Unicode regex engine.
                                             -- Tim Peters, 3 Dec 1998

---

• Previous message (by thread): A modest indentation proposal
• Next message (by thread): A modest indentation proposal
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list