Is Stackless Python DEAD?
Mike C. Fletcher
mcfletch at home.com
Mon Nov 5 13:36:26 EST 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Nov 5 13:36:26 EST 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Is Stackless Python DEAD?
- Next message (by thread): Is Stackless Python DEAD?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm not sure I understand this argument. The current version is drop-in-compatible with the standard Python 2.0 DLL. You don't re-compile anything in extension modules, they just work the same as with the standard distribution. The patch is (apparently, haven't looked at it) intrusive in it's re-design of the core loop of the interpreter (it is re-writing some pretty basic mechanisms, after all), but for user-land (as distinct from interpreter-implementer-land) code, it's pretty much transparent in my experience. With that said, there are likely to be systems that don't work well under (for instance) micro-threading. Modules that need locks and expect micro-threads to look like real threads will be disappointed (1000s of them can be running in a single OS-level thread, so regular thread locks don't block the micro-threads). However, that's a problem only for those users actually using the Stackless-specific stuff (in essence if there are no micro-threads running, then the thread-assuming extensions work fine). Enjoy, Mike -----Original Message----- From: python-list-admin at python.org [mailto:python-list-admin at python.org]On Behalf Of A.M. Kuchling Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 08:53 To: python-list at python.org Subject: Re: Is Stackless Python DEAD? On Mon, 05 Nov 2001 02:13:00 GMT, Frederic Giacometti <frederic.giacometti at arakne.com> wrote: >This words seems to point out that the actual reason is not technical... >This is definitely not a word from the realm of engineering, but more from >someone sense of his core self being disturbed by an outsider. Not at all. Stackless would have ramifications not just for a few files in the core, but also for all the extension modules that come with Python and for all the authors of third-party extension modules. In terms of number of files affected, "intrusive" isn't a bad word to describe the Stackless patches. --amk -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Previous message (by thread): Is Stackless Python DEAD?
- Next message (by thread): Is Stackless Python DEAD?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list