string object methods vs string module functions
Robin Becker
robin at jessikat.fsnet.co.uk
Tue Oct 23 19:46:59 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Oct 23 19:46:59 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): string object methods vs string module functions
- Next message (by thread): string object methods vs string module functions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a mailing to another list Steve Alexander <steve at cat-box.net> says > Various modules in Zope that used to use string functions a lot have > recently been converted to use string methods, and there was a noticible > speedup in performance as measured by benchmarks / testsuites. I would have thought this to be a minor speedup as the main work must still be in C, but have others any thoughts/experiences on this? A function which ReportLab uses a lot is join so my primitive hack test seems to bear out my intuition as join performance seems very similar. Clearly I'm not actually testing this properly, but are there any good disambiguating tests? >>> from time import time >>> from string import join >>> def doit0(L,n=10000): ... t0=time() ... for i in xrange(n): ... x=join(L,'') ... print '%.2f' % (time()-t0) ... >>> def doit1(L,n=10000): ... t0=time() ... for i in xrange(n): ... x=''.join(L) ... print '%.2f' % (time()-t0) ... >>> L=[chr(i) for i in xrange(256)] >>> doit0(L) 0.28 >>> doit1(L) 0.28 >>> -- Robin Becker
- Previous message (by thread): string object methods vs string module functions
- Next message (by thread): string object methods vs string module functions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list