scanf style parsing
Ralph Corderoy
ralph at inputplus.demon.co.uk
Mon Oct 1 06:23:16 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Oct 1 06:23:16 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): scanf style parsing
- Next message (by thread): scanf style parsing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, > > An easy, sure fire way for any programmer to learn regex concepts > > is to read Kernighan and Plauger's _Software Tools_ where, amongst > > many other interesting topics, they implement a regex pattern > > matcher and preceed to use it in their versions of grep, ed, etc. > > The problem is that this gives a narrow view of regexes and doesn't > show the full power available in complex regex languages in > Perl/Python. But that's part of its appeal. By just sticking with concatenation, repetition, and alternation you can see through the regex syntax to the implementation and the matching engine. Everything from then on is either syntax enhancements, e.g. r+ == rr*, or stuff that you can easily learn because you've a good grounding. > Much better is _Mastering Regular Expressions_ by Jeffrey Friedl, > though it badly needs freshening. I've read that and I think it goes too deep too soon and takes too many pages to do it. It is also cluttered in having to state all the exceptions at every turn, e.g. `but not in egrep'. _Software Tools_ gives sufficient grounding to a programmer in a chapter. Also, like you say, a large part of _Mastering Regular Expressions_ is out of date since Python and Perl have moved on. Given how much hassle JF said it was to right in the first place I wouldn't expect to see him queing up to right the 2nd Ed. :-) Cheers, Ralph.
- Previous message (by thread): scanf style parsing
- Next message (by thread): scanf style parsing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list