Rikard Bosnjakovic rikard at strakt.com
Mon Oct 22 10:08:26 EDT 2001

• Previous message (by thread): a better prime number generator
• Next message (by thread): a better prime number generator
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

John Thingstad wrote:

> This should work fast up to say 10000. 

[...]

> 		set = [x for x in set if x== n or x % p != 0)

That comprehension does not work. Where do you define "p"?


-- 
Cheers,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rikard Bosnjakovic                               http://bos.hack.org/cv/
Python Hacker                                          rikard at strakt.com
AB Strakt                                                   bos at hack.org

---

• Previous message (by thread): a better prime number generator
• Next message (by thread): a better prime number generator
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list