A small inconsistency in syntax?
Tim Peters
tim.one at home.com
Fri Oct 26 15:26:00 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Oct 26 15:26:00 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): A small inconsistency in syntax?
- Next message (by thread): A small inconsistency in syntax?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Steve Holden] > This is getting TOO weird. Should this really be allowed? Does it make > any kind of sense? The attached comes from 2.0, but 2.1.1 and 2.2b1 give > the same result. > > >>> [a,b] = (1,2) # no surprises here > >>> a > 1 > >>> b > 2 > >>> [a,b][1] = 23 # WHAT!?!?!?!?!?!? > >>> b > 2 > > What does the interpreter actually DO with this statement, and why is it > allowed? To what is the value 23 actually bound here? 23 is assigned to the slot at index 1 of the anonymous list created by the list-builder [a, b]. Much the same as, e.g., >>> anonymous = [a, b] >>> anonymous[1] = 23 >>> del anonymous >>> b It appears to be a challenge to dream up a good use for it, though <wink>.
- Previous message (by thread): A small inconsistency in syntax?
- Next message (by thread): A small inconsistency in syntax?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list