Why so few Python jobs? (and licenses)
Mark
mmealman at tarsis.org
Wed Oct 10 10:31:49 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Oct 10 10:31:49 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Why so few Python jobs? (and licenses)
- Next message (by thread): Why so few Python jobs? (and licenses)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <7xn13060xv.fsf at ruckus.brouhaha.com>, Paul Rubin wrote: > Cliff Wells <logiplexsoftware at earthlink.net> writes: > > leisure, sure, that's a gesture of goodwill. If I spend $5000 worth > of development time writing and releasing a feature for GIMP that I > could have had instead by paying $500 for a retail copy of Photoshop, > the GIMP author has (at least monetarily) benefitted from my effort > more than I've benefitted from his. (Note: that GIMP example is made > up, not something that really happened to me). The GIMP author isn't benefiting, so much as the community is. Even if the author took all that code, bundled it up and went commercial, the GPL ensures that your contribution and the origional work it contributed to remain in the public. Short term, going commercial may win the author some money, but longer term it's a dead end. The public version will likely exceed the commercial port in features and stability. I understand how it might be distasteful that the origional author might take your work and earn profit off of it. But if the alternative is that once you GPL software you lose all copyrights over it once anyone submits a patch, then there's every reason not to release your software under the GPL. I haven't read the GPL in awhile, but it seemed that the intent was that a software author DID keep his copyright on any software he GPL'd. It was win/win. Win for the author: he keeps his copyright, no one can take his software away from him if it's GPL. Win for the community: they gain his software, and not even the author can take it away from them. Right now I think the community is operating on a system of respect. Core authors are respecting patch submitters and not going commercial. But as more and more corps start using GPL resources I think we're going to have to define this aspect of the GPL a little better. If we don't, then I don't see how we're going to convince authors to use it on their software. -Mark -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! Check out our new Unlimited Server. No Download or Time Limits! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! ==-----
- Previous message (by thread): Why so few Python jobs? (and licenses)
- Next message (by thread): Why so few Python jobs? (and licenses)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list