Why not 3.__class__ ?
Michael Abbott
michael at rcp.co.uk
Thu Oct 11 02:42:18 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Oct 11 02:42:18 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Why not 3.__class__ ?
- Next message (by thread): Why not 3.__class__ ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"John Roth" <johnroth at ameritech.net> wrote in news:ts9hf46rvfp73a at news.supernews.com: > I presume (although I haven't tested it) that "3(x, y, z)" produces a > "not callable object" error, and "3[x]" produces a "not subscriptable" > error as well. I really can't see what calling '3' would do, but > subscripting '3' might be a neat way of getting the bit representation. Python 2.1 (#15, Apr 16 2001, 18:25:49) [MSC 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> 3(1) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? TypeError: object is not callable: 3 >>> Excellent! Already does the right thing...
- Previous message (by thread): Why not 3.__class__ ?
- Next message (by thread): Why not 3.__class__ ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list