Proposed PEP for a Conditional Expression
thp at cs.ucr.edu
thp at cs.ucr.edu
Sun Sep 16 22:42:38 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Sep 16 22:42:38 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Proposed PEP for a Conditional Expression
- Next message (by thread): Proposed PEP for a Conditional Expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
thp at cs.ucr.edu wrote: : James_Althoff at i2.com wrote: : : Marcin Kowalczyk wrote: : :> abs = if x>=0 then x else -x : :>or : :> abs = if x>=0: x else: -x : :>looks more readable than : :> abs = cond(x>=0, lambda:x, lambda:-x) : :>for me. : : That's a fair opinion. But you have to admit that the last one beats the : : heck out of the first two in terms of implementation issues. : As far as I can tell, it doesn't work if x is a local variable. Have : you actually tried it? Oops! I failed to note that you were presuming nested scopes. Tom Payne
- Previous message (by thread): Proposed PEP for a Conditional Expression
- Next message (by thread): Proposed PEP for a Conditional Expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list