"shell-commands" and python!
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
ignacio at openservices.net
Fri Sep 21 19:59:54 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Sep 21 19:59:54 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Simple process IO capture (Was: "shell-commands" and python!) - process.py (0/1)
- Next message (by thread): "shell-commands" and python!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 21 Sep 2001, Martijn Faassen wrote: > I don't think he was complaining at such. He was stating that he thought > Python could be less clunky and hoped someone would come up with ideas > on how, so they could discuss a possible improvement of the language. > > That does not mean necessarily it is possible to solve the perceived > shortcomings; the proposed solutions may not be desirable for other reasons > (obscuring matters, for instance). Python in this respect is more careful > to preserve internal coherence than Perl. > > But it does the language and the community no harm to discuss these issues. > Who knows, we may learn something. It is one way to improve your programming > language, too. Ease of redirection and backgrounding has not been a part of Python in the past, and we have to wonder whether adding those features is an actual improvement or just a nicety. In my mind it's just a nicety. If my needs are better met by another tool, I have absolutely no qualms about using that tool. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ignacio at openservices.net>
- Previous message (by thread): Simple process IO capture (Was: "shell-commands" and python!) - process.py (0/1)
- Next message (by thread): "shell-commands" and python!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list