Help with ASCII (UNIX<->DOS)
Malcolm Tredinnick
malcolm at commsecure.com.au
Wed Sep 26 23:17:17 EDT 2001
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Sep 26 23:17:17 EDT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Help with ASCII (UNIX<->DOS)
- Next message (by thread): Help with ASCII (UNIX<->DOS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Getting slightly off-topic, but ... On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 11:02:55PM -0400, Peter Hansen wrote: > Jeff Shannon wrote: > > "CeK!" wrote: [...] > > '%s\n' % data[0][1] (the inner parens are unnecessary) resolves into a > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > But nice style, given that it means any time the format string has > another item added to it (extremely comment situation), one can just > add a comma and the next item, rather than having to remember to add > parentheses, and figure out where to place them. > > And there'd be nothing wrong with (data[0][1], ) either.. For general debugging, there's a little trap here that the last case solves perfectly. Often I'll have some classes with __str__ defined, so I want to do something like '%s' % foo, rather than '%s' % repr(foo). Now, this doesn't work if things have gone horribly wrong (and the occasionally do) and foo is a list. The former case fails, the latter works. So I can either do '%s' % str(foo) or '%s' % (foo,), where the latter, as pointed out above, allows for adding more things to the list easily. Note that this doesn't happen to often, but if you are putting in debugging logging because the world has gone mad, it's extra defensive programming that can save time later. Cheers, Malcolm -- I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
- Previous message (by thread): Help with ASCII (UNIX<->DOS)
- Next message (by thread): Help with ASCII (UNIX<->DOS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list