Magnus Lie Hetland mlh at idi.ntnu.no
Fri Sep 28 15:02:10 EDT 2001

• Previous message (by thread): Is xmlrpclib slow?
• Next message (by thread): Is xmlrpclib slow?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

"Gillou" <nospam at bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:9ovlv0$1aaq$1 at norfair.nerim.net...
[snip]
> Hope the future xmlrpclib will use the new PyXML package in place of the
> _nearly deprecated_ xmllib.

Ah... I didn't realise it used xmllib. (I have expat installed.)

I guess that's a major factor. By the way, I don't see the need for
a full XML parser... Isn't the XML-RPC close to SML [1] compliant?
For that one should be able to make a fast Pure-Python parser using
re etc. (I've made a small one [2], but I doubt it's very fast...)

[1] http://www.docuverse.com/smldev/minxml.html
[2] http://www.hetland.org/python/sml.py

> --Gillou

--

  Magnus Lie Hetland         http://www.hetland.org

 "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in
  it, doesn't go away."           -- Philip K. Dick

---

• Previous message (by thread): Is xmlrpclib slow?
• Next message (by thread): Is xmlrpclib slow?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list