2.1 vs. 2.2
Jens Baader
nospam at nospam.com
Sat Apr 13 17:46:55 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Apr 13 17:46:55 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): 2.1 vs. 2.2
- Next message (by thread): 2.1 vs. 2.2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm downloading Python 2.2.1 right now and I wonder why you still produce bugfix releases for the old 2.1 development line. It seems that Python 2.2 is somewhat broken. If not what's the reason that keeps the people from upgrading to 2.2? Another question: When will we see an official ISO/ANSI standard for Python? I dislike working with nonstandardized languages. The fact that radical language changes are still made (the type/class unification) seem to suggest that Python is still not mature enough for a real standard. Or maybe Python and the other "newschool" languages (like Ruby, Java) are not meant to by standardized? Don't know but I really would like to. Are there any plans to get Python "stable" or will the language continue to change with each major release of the interpreter? TIA, Jens Jens
- Previous message (by thread): 2.1 vs. 2.2
- Next message (by thread): 2.1 vs. 2.2
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list