Anonymous functions (and classes)
Hellen Claggett
hellen at claggetts.net
Thu Apr 4 11:38:12 EST 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Apr 4 11:38:12 EST 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Anonymous functions (and classes)
- Next message (by thread): Anonymous functions (and classes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello, Here is a relativly simple feature that I would like to use while programming in Python. First, I did make a (brief) effort to determine if this specific request had been made and found nothing obvious in the PEPs or in this year's python-list archives. I would like to be able to define anonymous functions and classes by omitting the function or class name normally found after the def or class keyword. For example, the following two function definitions would be equivalent: def comfy(color='red'): print color, "comfy chair" comfy = def(color='red'): print color, "comfy chair" similarly, the following two class definitions would be equivalent class Comfy(object): pass Comfy = class(object): pass My two Pythonic* reasons for wanting this are: - Greater control over your namespace allowing the programmer to define a new function/class that is _not_ in the current namespace (Design Principle 19 :-) - A lambda replacement which is more consistent with all other function definitions. (Design Principles 9 & 13) Any comments? I'm particually curious to know how painful this change would be to python's innards. Thanks for your time, Jonathan *See: http://python.org/dev/culture.html
- Previous message (by thread): Anonymous functions (and classes)
- Next message (by thread): Anonymous functions (and classes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list