Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Fri Apr 12 11:54:28 EDT 2002

• Previous message (by thread): __iadd__ and fellows missing (Python 2.2)
• Next message (by thread): __iadd__ and fellows missing (Python 2.2)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Ralf Juengling <juenglin at informatik.uni-freiburg.de> writes:

> Shouldn't I find the special methods '__iadd__' et al, when
> asking for the attributes of 'int'?

ints are immutable, so they don't implement __iadd__.  lists do:

>>> [].__iadd__
<method-wrapper object at 0x8145f24>

> I couldn't find them either in ther operator-module:

Hmm, I think the issue here is that 

x += y

translates (in the presence of an __iadd__ method) roughly to 

x = x.__iadd__(x, y)

and you can't do that in the form of 

operator.blah(x,y)

.  Or it might just be oversight.

Cheers,
M.

-- 
  Remember - if all you have is an axe, every problem looks 
  like hours of fun.                                        -- Frossie
               -- http://home.xnet.com/~raven/Sysadmin/ASR.Quotes.html

---

• Previous message (by thread): __iadd__ and fellows missing (Python 2.2)
• Next message (by thread): __iadd__ and fellows missing (Python 2.2)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list