2.1 vs. 2.2
John Baxter
jwbaxter at spamcop.net
Mon Apr 15 23:47:28 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Apr 15 23:47:28 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Do you QA your Python? Was: 2.1 vs. 2.2
- Next message (by thread): Why are so many shorts in a knot? Was: Do you QA your Python?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <mailman.1018749868.11004.python-list at python.org>, Tim Peters <tim.one at comcast.net> wrote: > "The Python interpreter is very stable"*30000 Perfectly happy here with Python 2.1 on Mac OS X (10.1.3, although Python was compiled on a much older version). Rather pretty visual effect as the angled bands of light and dark passed by (in my 132x44 window). I'm glad I didn't try it on my 56K frame connection to elsewhere, though. --John
- Previous message (by thread): Do you QA your Python? Was: 2.1 vs. 2.2
- Next message (by thread): Why are so many shorts in a knot? Was: Do you QA your Python?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list