Python vs. Ruby (and os.path.walk)
Phil Tomson
ptkwt at shell1.aracnet.com
Sun Aug 11 02:05:19 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Aug 11 02:05:19 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs. Ruby (and os.path.walk)
- Next message (by thread): Python vs. Ruby (and os.path.walk)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <gX959.14794$Xb.1803611 at twister.socal.rr.com>, Steven Atkinson <sja at san.rr.com> wrote: [snipped stuff about Ruby being faster ....] > >I'm still leaning toward Python since Ruby seems just a tad awkward to me >(especially since script writing is not a everyday activity for me). > Well, at least Ruby is in the running... You probably wouldn't have considered Ruby a year ago which shows that we're making some progress ;-). Just curious, what aspects of Ruby do you find awkward? we're always looking to improve. I think you mentioned in the first post of this thread that you're a C++ programmer and you find Python more natural. I've also done a good bit of C++, but find Ruby more natural. I often find that I can do rapid protyping in Ruby and then easily convert the prototype over to C++ (or I bring C++ into Ruby using Swig)... but of course you can do the same in Python. Phil
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs. Ruby (and os.path.walk)
- Next message (by thread): Python vs. Ruby (and os.path.walk)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list