Greg Ewing see_reply_address at something.invalid
Wed Aug 21 02:05:16 EDT 2002

• Previous message (by thread): question about generators
• Next message (by thread): Names and bindings (was Re: Scope of instantiated class)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Andreas Leitgeb wrote:

> 
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding this, but
>  I strongly want to oppose any implicit propagation of nested
> generator-calls, whether recursive or not.

Don't worry, there wouldn't be any change in
semantics. What I'm talking about would only
be done when executing a "yield every" statement,
and it would only be an optimisation -- the
"yield every" statement would still have the
same semantics as a for-loop with a "yield"
in it.

> There may be better words than "every", perhaps "each" sounds better
> in this context.


I was originally thinking of using "yield from",
in the interests of re-using an existing keyword.
But since it can be a pseudo-keyword, that's
not really an issue.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept,
University of Canterbury,	
Christchurch, New Zealand
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~greg

---

• Previous message (by thread): question about generators
• Next message (by thread): Names and bindings (was Re: Scope of instantiated class)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list