Better solution
Michael Hudson
mwh at python.net
Wed Aug 21 04:24:47 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Aug 21 04:24:47 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Better solution
- Next message (by thread): Better solution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Bo M. Maryniuck" <b.maryniuk at forbis.lt> writes: > On Tuesday 20 August 2002 17:39, Michael Hudson wrote: > > > [x for x in lst if x] > > If you want to mutate the list, I'd say: > > lst[:] = filter(None, lst) > > is better than the monstrosity above. > > Hmm... why the mostrosity? Is this example code is too ugly? > >>> [x for x in ['', 'a', 'b','!', 'c'] if x not in ['!', '']] > ['a', 'b', 'c'] Oh, not *that* monstrosity, this one: lst = ['', 'a', '', 'b', 'c', '', 'd'] map(lambda z:lst.pop(lst.index('')), range(0, lst.count(''))) I realise what I wrote was a tad confusing. > Also what is [:]? A slice. Cheers, M. -- Reading Slashdot can [...] often be worse than useless, especially to young and budding programmers: it can give you exactly the wrong idea about the technical issues it raises. -- http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/klee/misc/slashdot.html#reasons
- Previous message (by thread): Better solution
- Next message (by thread): Better solution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list