Graham's spam filter
Heiko Wundram
hewu5001 at stud.uni-saarland.de
Thu Aug 22 23:52:44 EDT 2002
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Aug 22 23:52:44 EDT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): Graham's spam filter
- Next message (by thread): Graham's spam filter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am Fre, 2002-08-23 um 02.44 schrieb Erik Max Francis: > The client/server model also brings up another obvious issue: Ask you > what your roommates think about the potentiality for you to be able to > read all of their email. Err... I'm not trying to read their mail; that's why I propose only keeping the spam data on the central server. What each person considers spam doesn't necessarily vary very much; it basically is just an eMail that does unsolicited advertising/unsolicited sending of dialer-programs/unsolicited sending of virii. And if I wanted to read their mail, I could do it much more easily anyway, just installing a packet-sniffer on my PC (as the routers here are so ill configured that every port on them is a monitor port, but I can't change that, as I don't have admin-privs on them...). But still, I think keeping a central database of SPAM signatures is really the best way to start this, as the problem is that most users don't really know how to configure something like this unless you give them a course in configuring the system. The problem isn't necessarily the spam itself, but as I have noted the unsuspectable user. And I don't have the time nor the will to train them on what to consider spam/virii/etc. and what not! Consider that I am basically trying to write a program in my free time that will easen my job, and their lives, as I don't have to go running around anymore removing dialers or virii (hopefully). Ask yourself what is worth more: either having a scanner that _may_ reveal a little of personal information (when the person using it marks a legitimate mail as spam, and thus basically inserting the mail into the bad corpus), or a system that is worthless, as most users don't take the time/will to configure it... Oh, and by the way: The system as it is doesn't store the messages, it only stores the word-count in a database, so there isn't any realistic chance that you will be able to reconstruct a message after it has been inserted into the database. Yours, Heiko Wundram Netzwart Wohnheim-D Zimmer 2206 - Universität 18 - Saarbrücken
- Previous message (by thread): Graham's spam filter
- Next message (by thread): Graham's spam filter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list